Curbing Corruption in Brazilian Environmental Governance: A Collective Action and Problem-solving Approach

Rafael Küster Oliveira, Cleverson Vitório Andreoli () and Priscila Mata Cavalcante
Additional contact information
Rafael Küster Oliveira: Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná (PUCPR)
Cleverson Vitório Andreoli: Higher Institute of Administration and Economy of Mercosur (ISAE/FGV)
Priscila Mata Cavalcante: Public Prosecutor’s Office of Paraná State (MPPR)

A chapter in Corporate Social Responsibility in Brazil, 2019, pp 213-240 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract Brazil is much privileged with biodiversity and ecosystem services. However, the poor implementation of its environmental policies may offer fertile ground for corruption, thereby endangering ecosystem protection. It is widely agreed that corruption thrives where impunity prevails. This view lies with principal-agent theory. Nevertheless, the limited outcomes of anti-corruption interventions worldwide cast doubts on whether corruption can be sufficiently explained by principal-agent theory alone. In this context, we discuss corruption in Brazil’s environmental governance in light of the theoretical viewpoints of collective action and problem-solving. Drawing on these two perspectives, we argue that environmental policy instruments, such as environmental licensing, might be less prone to corruption by eliminating their major inefficiencies. That is, procedural problems (e.g., excessive bureaucracy, ambiguity in legal procedures and lack of electronic information systems) and absence of legitimacy and scientific credibility. Finally, we introduce the anti-corruption coalition Watershed Environmental Net—Coastal Watershed, from Public Prosecutor’s Office of Paraná State, and touch on corruption from a more closely principal-agent perspective. These three perspectives shed light on distinct and yet important issues regarding curbing corruption in Brazil’s environmental governance. Therefore, it is imperative that they be viewed as complementary rather than alternative approaches.

Keywords: Environmental licensing; Environmental impact assessment; Ecosystem services; Amazon; Corporate social responsibility (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:csrchp:978-3-319-90605-8_10

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783319906058

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-90605-8_10

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().