Is University Students’ Self-Assessment Accurate?
Alicia Bolívar-Cruz (),
Domingo Verano-Tacoronte () and
Sara González-Betancor
Additional contact information
Alicia Bolívar-Cruz: University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Domingo Verano-Tacoronte: University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Chapter Chapter 2 in Sustainable Learning in Higher Education, 2015, pp 21-35 from Springer
Abstract:
Abstract The paper’s main objective is to evaluate the self-assessment accuracy of university students. Specifically, the study analyzes the self-assessment of oral communication skills. It was carried out in a Firm Labor Organization course included in the Labor Relations and Human Resources Degree. The literature on self-assessment in Higher Education does not provide clear evidence about its accuracy, as a number of methodological problems have been detected. To reduce them, we have taken a number of precautions. Thus, a rubric was designed, and students were trained to use it. Several teachers and peers were introduced as referents, and a segmented analysis was conducted based on gender and the students’ level of competence from the teachers’ point of view. Results show that self-assessment accuracy is low. Moreover, regardless of the degree, men’s self-assessments are higher than women’s. Moreover, the findings suggest that the scoring rubric improves self-assessment accuracy when the speaker has good oral communication skills, but not when these skills are poor. These results lead us to propose the development of correction factors that can be adapted to any situation, thus allowing self-assessment to be used for summative purposes.
Keywords: Self-assessment Accuracy; Oral Communicative Competence; Summative Purposes; Falchikov; Peer Assessment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:innchp:978-3-319-10804-9_2
Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783319108049
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-10804-9_2
Access Statistics for this chapter
More chapters in Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().