Top-down or Bottom-up Project Tracking

Mario Vanhoucke

Chapter Chapter 6 in Measuring Time, 2009, pp 107-119 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract This chapter serves as an integrative summary research study relying on the results obtained from the three previous simulation studies discussed in this book so far. More precisely, a bottom-up and a top-down project tracking approach within a corrective action framework is compared and general summary conclusions are presented. The top-down tracking approach relies on a traditional Earned Value Management (EVM) system investigated in detail in chapter 4, while the bottom-up tracking mechanism makes use of the well-known Schedule Risk Analysis (SRA) method discussed in chapter 5

Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:isochp:978-1-4419-1014-1_6

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9781441910141

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-1014-1_6

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in International Series in Operations Research & Management Science from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().