Capacity Allocation and Flexibility in Primary Care
Hari Balasubramanian (),
Ana Muriel (),
Asli Ozen (),
Liang Wang (),
Xiaoling Gao () and
Jan Hippchen ()
Additional contact information
Hari Balasubramanian: University of Massachusetts
Ana Muriel: University of Massachusetts
Asli Ozen: University of Massachusetts
Liang Wang: University of Massachusetts
Xiaoling Gao: University of Massachusetts
Jan Hippchen: University of Massachusetts
Chapter Chapter 8 in Handbook of Healthcare Operations Management, 2013, pp 205-228 from Springer
Abstract:
Abstract We discuss capacity allocation for primary care practices at three different planning levels: the strategic, the tactical and the operational. The goal in each case is to maximize two important but often conflicting metrics: (1) timely access and (2) patient-physician continuity. Timely access focuses on the ability of a patient to get access to a physician as soon as possible. Patient-physician continuity refers to building a strong relationship between a patient and a specific physician by maximizing patient visits to that physician. Each primary care provider (PCP) has a panel of patients for whose long term holistic care the PCP is responsible. At the highest or strategic level, the design of physician panels, we demonstrate the impact of case-mix, or the type of patients in a physician’s panel, and show how panels can be redesigned effectively. Panel redesign, however, involves changing existing patient-physician relationships. A viable alternative is managing the inherent flexibility of PCPs to see patients of other physicians. At the tactical level, this requires allocating the flexible capacity to two types of appointments: 1) prescheduled appointments which are booked in advance and require continuity; and 2) same-day appointments. Using a 2-stage stochastic optimization model, we show that greedy algorithms find the optimal capacity allocation, and find that a partially flexible practice provides a good compromise between timely-access and continuity. Finally, at the operational level, the implementation of flexibility during a workday has to be made under partial demand information, as patient calls arrive over the course of a day. We discuss the impact of flexibility and suggest heuristics that practices can use in this dynamic case.
Keywords: Primary Care Provider; Timely Access; Primary Care Practice; Capacity Allocation; Panel Size (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:isochp:978-1-4614-5885-2_8
Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9781461458852
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-5885-2_8
Access Statistics for this chapter
More chapters in International Series in Operations Research & Management Science from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().