Regulation, Trade, and Market Power: Agricultural Chemical Markets and Incentives for Biotechnology
Vincent H. Smith
Additional contact information
Vincent H. Smith: Montana State University
Chapter Chapter 18 in Regulating Agricultural Biotechnology: Economics and Policy, 2006, pp 397-419 from Springer
Abstract Chemical companies generally support environmental regulatory segregation of Canadian and U.S. agricultural chemical markets, apparently because it enables them to practice third-order price discrimination. This study provides new cross-section evidence that suggests that price discrimination is practiced. We consider the potential implications of chemical market segregation for the innovation and adoption of biotechnologies that are linked to chemical use and chemical prices in the context of a two-sector-two-country model solved as a two-stage game. Biotechnology implications of regulatory harmonization that reintegrates the two chemical markets are then examined.
Keywords: price discrimination; agricultural chemicals; biotechnology (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:nrmchp:978-0-387-36953-2_18
Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this chapter
More chapters in Natural Resource Management and Policy from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().