Pava, Calvin: Sociotechnical Systems Design for the “Digital Coal Mines”

Douglas Austrom () and Carolyn Ordowich ()
Additional contact information
Douglas Austrom: Kelley School of Business, Indiana University
Carolyn Ordowich: STS Associates

Chapter 75 in The Palgrave Handbook of Organizational Change Thinkers, 2021, pp 1293-1323 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract Calvin Pava made an extraordinary contribution to the future of work design and organizational change in the twenty-first century. He reconceptualized traditional sociotechnical systems theory (STS) methodology for nonroutine work analysis and planning, as the design of deliberations and discretionary coalitions focused on collaboration among disparate people where tension, disagreement, and conflict improve the value of the ideas, expose the risks inherent in the plan, and lead to enhanced trust among the participants. Pava provided us with a model for a flexible and scalable organizational architecture based on the precepts of self-regulation; it is a template for combining and integrating self-managing work teams (routine work), project teams (hybrid work), and discretionary coalitions (nonroutine work) into a “network” organization. He also recognized that our increasingly turbulent environment required viewing organizational change less as an event and more as an ongoing dynamic of iterative design. Pava’s work in the 1970’s and early 1980’s is also an especially effective fit for the twenty-first century and a digital era that requires tapping into networks of value, connecting information sources, and bridging internal as well as external boundaries. He foresaw addressing more complex problems with sociotechnical design enhanced by information and communication technology leading to more robust solutions. But Pava also recognized the dilemma that advanced technology posed: it could be designed for the flourishing of mankind or to manipulate people and engender passivity in the rest of society, and he strongly warned us to exercise organizational choice in order to disobey the new digital technocratic imperative.

Keywords: Sociotechnical systems design; Nonroutine knowledge work; Deliberations; Discretionary coalitions; Technocratic imperative (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-38324-4_104

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783030383244

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-38324-4_104

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().