They Said What? Investigating Fan Online Commentary in Politics and Sport
Cody T. Havard (),
Brendan Dwyer () and
Jennifer L. Gellock ()
Additional contact information
Cody T. Havard: The University of Memphis
Brendan Dwyer: Virginia Commonwealth University
Jennifer L. Gellock: North Alabama University
Chapter Chapter 3 in Rivalry and Group Behavior Among Consumers and Brands, 2021, pp 33-56 from Springer
Abstract:
Abstract The study addressed the phenomenon of group membership and how group members engage in online commentary. Specifically, the paper investigated comments left in online chatrooms during the three presidential debates in 2016 and three prominent college football rivalry games. Findings showed that people choosing to leave comments in an online chatroom did so to (1) comment on the nature of the rivalry or relationship, (2) comment on the game itself, or (3) to derogate the out-group. Further, a higher proportion of comments left in the political chatrooms were negative toward the out-group compared to the sport setting. Implications are discussed, and the paper presents directions for future inquiry and ideas for addressing out-group negativity in political fandom.
Keywords: Rivalry; Fandom; Politics; Sport; Group membership; Online communication (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-85245-0_3
Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783030852450
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-85245-0_3
Access Statistics for this chapter
More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().