AI and Data-intensive Surveillance in Professional Work: Transforming Discretion and Accountability

Annette Kamp (), Sidsel Lond Grosen () and Agnete Meldgaard Hansen ()
Additional contact information
Annette Kamp: Roskilde University
Sidsel Lond Grosen: Roskilde University
Agnete Meldgaard Hansen: Roskilde University

Chapter Chapter 8 in Digital Technology, Algorithmic Governance and Workplace Democracy, 2025, pp 225-248 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract In this chapter we interrogate how digital surveillance technologies in healthcare may transform professional work and impact professional knowledge, discretion, and accountability by functioning as algorithmic management and reinforcing existing regimes of control and responsibilization. We present a case study on the implementation of an AI-based surveillance technology used for the remote monitoring of discharged patients from a Danish hospital ward. In this new arrangement of work, where data act as proxies for the embodied patient, we explore how nurses’ professionalism and accountabilities are challenged and reconfigured. In relation to this, we stress how the use of the AI-based surveillance technology creates new visibilities, allowing for new modes of monitoring and control of professionals’ (re)actions and decision-making, underlining the multidirectional character of surveillance (Lyon, 2018). We demonstrate how a combination of expanded tasks and opacity leads to intensified work and strain for the nurses and their professional relationships, as it simultaneously expands their responsibilities, impedes their professional assessments, and makes their assessments visible and open for surveillance to colleagues and management. Also, the study suggests that testing being a permanent situation, changes work and challenges professionalism in complex ways, and frames the room for co-determination differently from regular implementation of new technology. Our study emphasizes how transformation of power relations may unfold in complex and sometimes subtle ways. Taking as a starting point recent reforms based on digitalization, we describe an increased responsibilization of the professionals, while their powers to deal with possibly conflicting demands and opportunities to prioritize, are not increased.

Keywords: Datafication; Surveillance; Professional work; Autonomy; Power relations (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-032-02754-2_8

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783032027542

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-032-02754-2_8

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().