Eric J. Miller: Practicing Scholar in Action

Jean E. Neumann () and Antonio Sama ()
Additional contact information
Jean E. Neumann: The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations
Antonio Sama: Canterbury Christ Church University

Chapter 52 in The Palgrave Handbook of Organizational Change Thinkers, 2017, pp 863-880 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract Miller, E. J.This chapter traces Eric Miller’s early career from social anthropologist in industry through four decades as a second-generation social scientist for the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations (TIHR). We assert that each decade can be understood as emphasizing one of Eric’s contributions within four categories that sustain our field today. (1) Systems of Organization (Miller and Rice 1967) stands as a seminal contribution to organizational theory and work organization design. Not only does Eric’s original research with Ken RiceRice, A. K. in Indian weaving sheds embody the emerging principles of socio-technical systems, but their ideas about boundaries, levels of analysis, representational meetings, and differentiation between subsystems led to extending systems thinking into other sectors. (2) Eric’s extensive action research shaped social policies in a range of “people processing institutions”: for example, geriatric and psychiatric hospitals; the education, treatment, and support of people with disabilities; and role changes for nurses, occupational health specialists, and wives in diplomatic service. His “working notes” and “working hypotheses” technique helps outsiders and insiders to mutually negotiate action, bringing together organizational development with action research. (3) By his third decade at TIHR, Miller demonstrated explicit concern with systems change and societal analysis, applying social science for social problems (e.g., workers’ strikes, relations between immigrant communities); he began using cross-boundary developments that required both systems design and psychodynamic interpretation (e.g., mergers and acquisitions, a Mexican water system). An outcome of this concern was an Organization for the Promotion of Understanding of Society (OPUS). (4) While Eric directed TIHR’s group relations and experiential learning offerings from 1970, he emphasized that culturally appropriate dissemination needed to be led by people within their own countries. Thus, while avoiding hero worship, Miller encouraged the formation of two dozen institutions scattered around the world, each identifying somehow with Tavistock schools of thought.

Keywords: Action research; A. K. Rice; Anthropologist in industry; Cultural change; Group relations; Role analysis; Societal analysis; Socio-technical systems; Systems psychodynamics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-319-52878-6_19

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783319528786

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-52878-6_19

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().