Empirical Study of Pedestrians’ Characteristics at Bottlenecks

Andreas Winkens (), Tobias Rupprecht, Armin Seyfried () and Wolfram Klingsch
Additional contact information
Andreas Winkens: University of Wuppertal, Institute for Building Material Technology and Fire Safety Science
Tobias Rupprecht: University of Wuppertal, Institute for Building Material Technology and Fire Safety Science
Armin Seyfried: Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich Supercomputing Centre
Wolfram Klingsch: University of Wuppertal, Institute for Building Material Technology and Fire Safety Science

A chapter in Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics 2008, 2010, pp 263-268 from Springer

Abstract: Summary The design procedures of Nelson and Mowrer in the SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering (Society of Fire Protection Engineers, Bethesda, MD, 2002) and Predtetchenskii and Milinskii (PM) in Planning for Foot Traffic Flow in Buildings (Amerind, New Dehli, 1969) are frequently used for capacity analysis of pedestrian facilities, e.g. egress routes. Both agree that congestion occurs in front of a bottleneck, if the incoming flow exceeds the capacity. However, in case of a present congestion in front of a bottleneck, their approaches differ considerably. Nelson assumes that in this case the flow inside a bottleneck is determined by the bottleneck capacity. PM instead expect that the density in front of the entrance to the bottleneck is significant higher than the density, which is attributed to the capacity, and thus the flow inside is lower than the capacity. Furthermore PM assume that the density inside is generally significant lower than the density in front of the bottleneck. To resolve these discrepancies we studied the pedestrian flow through a bottleneck (Rupprecht, Diploma thesis, University of Wuppertal, 2006) as well as the density and the jam occurrence in front of a bottleneck (Winkens, Diploma thesis, University of Wuppertal, 2007) by an experiment performed under laboratory conditions. The aim was to get reliable data concerning the density directly in front of and inside the bottleneck and thereby to check the assumptions of Nelson and Mowrer and Predtetchenskii and Milinskii. We found that during the stationary state the density in front of the bottleneck does not depend on the bottleneck width b for 0.8 m≤b≤1.2 m. In conformance with PM the density inside is significantly lower than in front of the bottleneck. In reference to the continuity equation these results cast doubts on the assumption of Nelson that the flow through a bottleneck maintains the value of the capacity if a congestion appears in front of the bottleneck.

Keywords: Measurement Area; Fire Safety; Test Person; Granular Flow; Diploma Thesis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-642-04504-2_22

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783642045042

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-04504-2_22

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().