The Equivalence of Strict Liability and Negligence Rule: A « Trompe l'œil » Perspective

Gerard Mondello

No 121910, Economy and Society from Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM)

Abstract: This paper analyzes the difficulties of comparing the respective effectiveness of two among the most important liability regimes in tort law: rule of negligence and strict liability. Starting from the standard Shavellian unilateral accident scheme, I show that matching up liability regime on their capacity to provide the highest level of safety is ineffective. This demonstration lies on two components. The first one gathers some results drawn from literature that introduces uncertainty. The second one takes into consideration the beliefs of agents and their aversion to ambiguity. The model applies uncertainty to the level of maximum damage. This demonstration reinforces the previous result. Hence, both regimes apply on specific tort question and comparing their individual efficiency needs to call for other components as the transaction costs associated to the burden of evidence, the fairness between victims and injurers, etc.

Keywords: Risk; and; Uncertainty (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 32
Date: 2012-02
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/121910/files/NDL2012-008.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: The Equivalence of Strict Liability and Negligence Rule: A « Trompe l'œil » Perspective (2012)
Working Paper: The Equivalence of Strict Liability and Negligence Rule: A "Trompe l'oeil" Perspective (2012)
Working Paper: The Equivalence of Strict Liability and Negligence Rule: A " Trompe l'œil " Perspective (2012)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:feemso:121910

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.121910

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Economy and Society from Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().