Options for Improving Conservation Programs: Insights from Auction Theory and Economic Experiments

Daniel Hellerstein, Nathaniel Higgins and Michael Roberts

No 262210, Economic Research Report from United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service

Abstract: The U.S. Department of Agriculture spends over $5 billion per year on conservation programs, mostly on voluntary programs that give financial assistance to farmers and landowners to provide environmental services (such as implementing nutrient management programs or planting native grasses). Since most programs cannot fund all interested parties, program managers must use some mechanism to select applicants. One option is to elicit offers through an auction. This report addresses the use of auctions in conservation programs. It considers how information in the hands of Government officials and rural landowners affects the auction’s performance, and how auction design can reduce Government expenditures or encourage landowners to provide greater environmental services. Results of laboratory experiments are discussed, highlighting shortcomings of common features of conservation program auctions (such as limits on the rent landowners may request), as well as how alternative auction designs can improve performance.

Keywords: Agricultural and Food Policy; Environmental Economics and Policy; Land Economics/Use (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 53
Date: 2015-01-01
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (25)

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/262210/files/50532_err181.pdf (application/pdf)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/262210/files/50532_err181.pdf?subformat=pdfa (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Options for Improving Conservation Programs: Insights From Auction Theory and Economic Experiments (2015)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:uersrr:262210

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.262210

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Economic Research Report from United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().