Beyond the Gini index: Measuring inequality with the Balance of Inequality index

Giorgio Di Maio and Paolo Landoni

No 1506, a/ Working Papers Series from Italian Association for the Study of Economic Asymmetries, Rome (Italy)

Abstract: In the first part of this paper, we present the Balance of Inequality (BOI) index, a new approach to the measurement of inequality in which each individual is given a weight equal to her income, and the barycenter of the income distribution is used to measure its inequality. The BOI index features an intuitive physical interpretation and a simple graphical representation that shows the income distribution and the inequality measure together. The index’s lower and upper bounds are always 0 and 1, which indicates that it is an accurate measure of inequality even when applied to small populations and small samples – cases in which the Gini index is downward biased. We also show that the BOI index is related to the Gini index. In the second part of the paper, we decompose inequality by population subgroups for both the BOI, and Gini indices with a new approach that considers the distribution of the individual members of each subgroup in the population. This decomposition is accomplished by introducing the barycenter of the subgroups for cases of perfect equality and perfect inequality, the asymmetry effect and the irregularity effect. After demonstrating that the BOI index is decomposable by population subgroups, we show that i) the lower and upper bounds of the BOI index and of the Gini index are computable when grouped data or mean incomes are available but the inequalities within subgroups are unknown (without any assumptions regarding the distribution function), ii) the BOI index and the Gini index can be computed with frequency distributions, and iii) the average within-subgroup inequality implied in the Gini indices of the population inequality given with grouped data can be computed. We also show that the Lambert-Aronson (1993) residual i) can be non-null when the subsets do not overlap and ii) is not the effect of the overlapping between subgroups but of the approach used. Finally, we outline the BOI index decomposition by income sources and propose a new formulation of the population principle.

Keywords: Inequality measurement; Gini index; Inequality decomposition by population subgroups; Inequality decomposition by income sources; Balance of Inequality; BOI index; Asymmetry Effect; Irregularity Effect; R concentration ratio. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D31 D63 I32 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 119 pages
Date: 2015-08
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.asimmetrie.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/AISWP201506.pdf Third version, 2015 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ais:wpaper:1506

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in a/ Working Papers Series from Italian Association for the Study of Economic Asymmetries, Rome (Italy) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Alberto Bagnai ().