Sorting versus Screening in Decentralized Markets with Adverse Selection
Sarah Auster () and
Piero Gottardi
Additional contact information
Sarah Auster: Department of Economics, University of Bonn
No 180, ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series from University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany
Abstract:
We study the role of traders' meeting capacities in decentralized markets with adverse selection. Uninformed customers choose trading mechanisms in order to find a provider for a service. Providers are privately informed about their quality and aim to match with one of the customers. We consider a rich set of meeting technologies and characterize the properties of the equilibrium allocations for each of them. In equilibrium, different provider types can be separated either via sorting---they self-select into different submarkets---or screening within the trading mechanism, or a combination of the two. We show that, as the meeting technology improves, the equilibrium features more screening and less sorting. Interestingly, this reduces both the average quality of trade as well as the total level of trade in the economy. The trading losses are, however, compensated by savings in entry costs, so that welfare increases.
Keywords: Competitive Search; Adverse Selection; Market Segmentation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C78 D44 D83 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: pages
Date: 2022-07
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-mic
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econtribute.de/RePEc/ajk/ajkdps/ECONtribute_180_2022.pdf First version, 2022 (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Sorting versus screening in decentralized markets with adverse selection (2024) 
Working Paper: Sorting Versus Screening in Decentralized Markets With Adverse Selection (2022) 
Working Paper: Sorting versus Screening in Decentralized Markets with Adverse Selection (2022) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ajk:ajkdps:180
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series from University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany Niebuhrstrasse 5, 53113 Bonn, Germany.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ECONtribute Office ().