EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Bias-variance trade-off in portfolio optimization under Expected Shortfall with $\ell_2$ regularization

G\'abor Papp, Fabio Caccioli and Imre Kondor ()

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: The optimization of a large random portfolio under the Expected Shortfall risk measure with an $\ell_2$ regularizer is carried out by analytical calculation. The regularizer reins in the large sample fluctuations and the concomitant divergent estimation error, and eliminates the phase transition where this error would otherwise blow up. In the data-dominated region, where the number $N$ of different assets in the portfolio is much less than the length $T$ of the available time series, the regularizer plays a negligible role even if its strength $\eta$ is large, while in the opposite limit, where the size of samples is comparable to, or even smaller than the number of assets, the optimum is almost entirely determined by the regularizer. We construct the contour map of estimation error on the $N/T$ vs. $\eta$ plane and find that for a given value of the estimation error the gain in $N/T$ due to the regularizer can reach a factor of about 4 for a sufficiently strong regularizer.

Date: 2016-02, Revised 2018-07
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-rmg
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1602.08297 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:1602.08297

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().

 
Page updated 2023-06-15
Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1602.08297