Risk Arbitrage and Hedging to Acceptability under Transaction Costs

Emmanuel Lépinette and Ilya Molchanov

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: The classical discrete time model of proportional transaction costs relies on the assumption that a feasible portfolio process has solvent increments at each step. We extend this setting in two directions, allowing for convex transaction costs and assuming that increments of the portfolio process belong to the sum of a solvency set and a family of multivariate acceptable positions, e.g. with respect to a dynamic risk measure. We describe the sets of superhedging prices, formulate several no (risk) arbitrage conditions and explore connections between them. In the special case when multivariate positions are converted into a single fixed asset, our framework turns into the no good deals setting. However, in general, the possibilities of assessing the risk with respect to any asset or a basket of the assets lead to a decrease of superhedging prices and the no arbitrage conditions become stronger. The mathematical technique relies on results for unbounded and possibly non-closed random sets in Euclidean space.

Date: 2016-05, Revised 2020-04
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-rmg
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Published in Finance and Stochastics, 2021, 25, 101-132

Downloads: (external link)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1605.07884 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:1605.07884

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().