Mislearning from Censored Data: The Gambler's Fallacy and Other Correlational Mistakes in Optimal-Stopping Problems
Papers from arXiv.org
I study endogenous learning dynamics for people who misperceive intertemporal correlations in random sequences. Biased agents face an optimal-stopping problem. They are uncertain about the underlying distribution and learn its parameters from predecessors. Agents stop when early draws are "good enough," so predecessors' experiences contain negative streaks but not positive streaks. When agents wrongly expect systematic reversals (the "gambler's fallacy"), they understate the likelihood of consecutive below-average draws, converge to over-pessimistic beliefs about the distribution's mean, and stop too early. Agents uncertain about the distribution's variance overestimate it to an extent that depends on predecessors' stopping thresholds. I also analyze how other misperceptions of intertemporal correlation interact with endogenous data censoring.
Date: 2018-03, Revised 2021-08
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-mic
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6) Track citations by RSS feed
Published in Theoretical Economics 17(3):1269-1312, 2022
Downloads: (external link)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1803.08170 Latest version (application/pdf)
Journal Article: Mislearning from censored data: The gambler's fallacy and other correlational mistakes in optimal-stopping problems (2022)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:1803.08170
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().