Quantifying the Computational Advantage of Forward Orthogonal Deviations

Robert Phillips

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: Under suitable conditions, one-step generalized method of moments (GMM) based on the first-difference (FD) transformation is numerically equal to one-step GMM based on the forward orthogonal deviations (FOD) transformation. However, when the number of time periods ($T$) is not small, the FOD transformation requires less computational work. This paper shows that the computational complexity of the FD and FOD transformations increases with the number of individuals ($N$) linearly, but the computational complexity of the FOD transformation increases with $T$ at the rate $T^{4}$ increases, while the computational complexity of the FD transformation increases at the rate $T^{6}$ increases. Simulations illustrate that calculations exploiting the FOD transformation are performed orders of magnitude faster than those using the FD transformation. The results in the paper indicate that, when one-step GMM based on the FD and FOD transformations are the same, Monte Carlo experiments can be conducted much faster if the FOD version of the estimator is used.

Date: 2018-08
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cmp
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1808.05995 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:1808.05995

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().