Surprised by the Hot Hand Fallacy? A Truth in the Law of Small Numbers

Joshua B. Miller and Adam Sanjurjo

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: We prove that a subtle but substantial bias exists in a common measure of the conditional dependence of present outcomes on streaks of past outcomes in sequential data. The magnitude of this streak selection bias generally decreases as the sequence gets longer, but increases in streak length, and remains substantial for a range of sequence lengths often used in empirical work. We observe that the canonical study in the influential hot hand fallacy literature, along with replications, are vulnerable to the bias. Upon correcting for the bias we find that the long-standing conclusions of the canonical study are reversed.

Date: 2019-02
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)

Published in Econometrica, Vol. 86, No. 6 (November 2018), pp. 2019-2047

Downloads: (external link)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.01265 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:1902.01265

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().