EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Journal ranking should depend on the level of aggregation

L\'aszl\'o Csat\'o

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: Journal ranking is becoming more important in assessing the quality of academic research. Several indices have been suggested for this purpose, typically on the basis of a citation graph between the journals. We follow an axiomatic approach and find an impossibility theorem: any self-consistent ranking method, which satisfies a natural monotonicity property, should depend on the level of aggregation. Our result presents a trade-off between two axiomatic properties and reveals a dilemma of aggregation. This contribution reinforces that scientometrics cannot be entirely based on the use of bibliometric indices.

New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-sog
Date: 2019-04, Revised 2019-06
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1904.06300 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:1904.06300

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().

 
Page updated 2019-06-12
Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1904.06300