The Murphy Decomposition and the Calibration-Resolution Principle: A New Perspective on Forecast Evaluation
Marc-Oliver Pohle
Papers from arXiv.org
Abstract:
I provide a unifying perspective on forecast evaluation, characterizing accurate forecasts of all types, from simple point to complete probabilistic forecasts, in terms of two fundamental underlying properties, autocalibration and resolution, which can be interpreted as describing a lack of systematic mistakes and a high information content. This "calibration-resolution principle" gives a new insight into the nature of forecasting and generalizes the famous sharpness principle by Gneiting et al. (2007) from probabilistic to all types of forecasts. It amongst others exposes the shortcomings of several widely used forecast evaluation methods. The principle is based on a fully general version of the Murphy decomposition of loss functions, which I provide. Special cases of this decomposition are well-known and widely used in meteorology. Besides using the decomposition in this new theoretical way, after having introduced it and the underlying properties in a proper theoretical framework, accompanied by an illustrative example, I also employ it in its classical sense as a forecast evaluation method as the meteorologists do: As such, it unveils the driving forces behind forecast errors and complements classical forecast evaluation methods. I discuss estimation of the decomposition via kernel regression and then apply it to popular economic forecasts. Analysis of mean forecasts from the US Survey of Professional Forecasters and quantile forecasts derived from Bank of England fan charts indeed yield interesting new insights and highlight the potential of the method.
Date: 2020-05
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ecm, nep-for and nep-gen
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)
Downloads: (external link)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.01835 Latest version (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:2005.01835
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().