A Negative Correlation Strategy for Bracketing in Difference-in-Differences
Raiden Hasegawa and
Dylan S. Small
Papers from arXiv.org
The method of difference-in-differences (DID) is widely used to study the causal effect of policy interventions in observational studies. DID employs a before and after comparison of the treated and control units to remove bias due to time-invariant unmeasured confounders under the parallel trends assumption. Estimates from DID, however, will be biased if the outcomes for the treated and control units evolve differently in the absence of treatment, namely if the parallel trends assumption is violated. We propose a general identification strategy that leverages two groups of control units whose outcomes relative to the treated units exhibit a negative correlation, and achieves partial identification of the average treatment effect for the treated. The identified set is of a union bounds form that involves the minimum and maximum operators, which makes the canonical bootstrap generally inconsistent and naive methods overly conservative. By utilizing the directional inconsistency of the bootstrap distribution, we develop a novel bootstrap method to construct uniformly valid confidence intervals for the identified set and parameter of interest when the identified set is of a union bounds form, and we establish the method's theoretical properties. We develop a simple falsification test and sensitivity analysis. We apply the proposed strategy for bracketing to study whether minimum wage laws affect employment levels.
Date: 2020-06, Revised 2021-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ecm
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/2006.02423 Latest version (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:2006.02423
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().