Client engineering of XVA in crisis and normality: Restructuring, Mandatory Breaks and Resets

Chris Kenyon

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: Crises challenge client XVA management when continuous collateralization is not possible because a derivative locks in the client credit level and the provider's funding level, on the trade date, for the life of the trade. We price XVA reduction strategies from the client point of view comparing multiple trade strategies using Mandatory Breaks or Restructuring, to modifications of a single trade using a Reset. We analyse previous crises and recovery of CDS to inform our numerical examples. In our numerical examples Resets can be twice as effective as Mandatory Break/Restructuring if there is no credit recovery. When recovery is at least 1/3 of the credit shock then Mandatory Break/Restructuring can be more effective.

Date: 2020-09
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/2009.12901 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:2009.12901

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().