Discrimination in the Venture Capital Industry: Evidence from Field Experiments

Ye Zhang

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: This paper examines discrimination by early-stage investors based on startup founders' gender and race using two complementary field experiments with real U.S. venture capitalists. Results show the following. (i) Discrimination varies depending on the context. Investors implicitly discriminate against female and Asian founders when evaluating attractive startups, but they favor female and Asian founders when evaluating struggling startups. This helps to reconcile the contradictory results in the extant literature and confirms the theoretical predictions of "discrimination reversion" and "pro-cyclical discrimination" phenomena. (ii) Among multiple coexisting sources of discrimination identified, statistical discrimination and implicit discrimination are important reasons for investors' "anti-minority" behaviors. A consistent estimator is developed to measure the polarization of investors' discrimination behaviors and their separate driving forces. (iii) Homophily exists when investors provide anonymous encouragement to startups in a non-investment setting. (iv) There was temporary, stronger discrimination against Asian founders during the COVID-19 outbreak.

Date: 2020-10, Revised 2022-08
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ent, nep-exp and nep-sea
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/2010.16084 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:2010.16084

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().