On a Standard Method for Measuring the Natural Rate of Interest

Daniel Buncic

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: I show that Holston, Laubach and Williams' (2017) implementation of Median Unbiased Estimation (MUE) cannot recover the signal-to-noise ratio of interest from their Stage 2 model. Moreover, their implementation of the structural break regressions which are used as an auxiliary model in MUE deviates from Stock and Watson's (1998) formulation. This leads to spuriously large estimates of the signal-to-noise parameter $\lambda _{z}$ and thereby an excessive downward trend in other factor $z_{t}$ and the natural rate. I provide a correction to the Stage 2 model specification and the implementation of the structural break regressions in MUE. This correction is quantitatively important. It results in substantially smaller point estimates of $\lambda _{z}$ which affects the severity of the downward trend in other factor $z_{t}$. For the US, the estimate of $\lambda _{z}$ shrinks from $0.040$ to $0.013$ and is statistically highly insignificant. For the Euro Area, the UK and Canada, the MUE point estimates of $\lambda _{z}$ are \emph{exactly} zero. Natural rate estimates from HLW's model using the correct Stage 2 MUE implementation are up to 100 basis points larger than originally computed.

Date: 2021-03, Revised 2022-04
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-mac
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/2103.16452 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:2103.16452

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators (help@arxiv.org).