Costly Trading

Michael Isichenko

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: We revisit optimal execution of an active portfolio in the presence of slippage (aka linear, proportional, or absolute-value) costs. Market efficiency implies a close balance between active alphas and trading costs, so even small changes to trading optimization can make a big difference. It has been observed for some time that optimal trading involves a pattern of a no-trade zone with width $\Delta$ increasing with slippage cost parameter $c$. In a setting of a reasonably stable (non-stochastic) forecast of future returns and a quadratic risk aversion, it is shown that $\Delta\sim c^{1/2}$, which differs from the $\Delta\sim c^{1/3}$ scaling reported for stochastic settings. Analysis of optimal trading employs maximization of a utility including projected alpha-based profits, slippage costs, and risk aversion and borrows from a physical analogy of forced motion in the presence of friction.

Date: 2021-10
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-mst and nep-upt
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/2110.15239 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:2110.15239

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().