When Can We Ignore Measurement Error in the Running Variable?

Yingying Dong and Michal Koles\'ar

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: In many applications of regression discontinuity designs, the running variable used by the administrator to assign treatment is only observed with error. We show that, provided the observed running variable (i) correctly classifies the treatment assignment, and (ii) affects the conditional means of the potential outcomes smoothly, ignoring the measurement error nonetheless yields an estimate with a causal interpretation: the average treatment effect for units whose observed running variable equals to the cutoff. We show that, possibly after doughnut trimming, these assumptions accommodate a variety of settings where support of the measurement error is not too wide. We propose to conduct inference using bias-aware methods, which remain valid even when discreteness or irregular support in the observed running variable may lead to partial identification. We illustrate the results for both sharp and fuzzy designs in an empirical application.

Date: 2021-11, Revised 2023-02
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ecm
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Published in Journal of Applied Econometrics, Volume 38, Issue 5, August 2023, pages 735-750

Downloads: (external link)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/2111.07388 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:2111.07388

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().