Revisiting Group Differences in High-Dimensional Choices: Method and Application to Congressional Speech

Paul Hofmarcher, Jan V\'avra, Sourav Adhikari and Bettina Gr\"un

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: Gentzkow, Shapiro and Taddy, Econometrica Vol 87, No 4, 2019 (henceforth GST) use a supervised text-based regression model to assess changes in partisanship in U.S. congressional speech over time. Their estimates imply that partisanship is far greater in recent years than in the past, and that it increased sharply in the early 1990s. The paper at hand provides a replication in the wide sense of GST by complementing their analysis in three ways. First, we propose an alternative unsupervised language model, which combines ideas of topic models and ideal point models, to analyze the change in partisanship over time. We apply this model to the Senate speech data used in GST ranging from 1981-2017. Using our model we replicate their results on the specific evolution of partisanship. Second, our model provides additional insights such as the data-driven estimation of evolvement of topical contents over time. Third, we identify key phrases of partisanship on topic level.

Date: 2022-06, Revised 2025-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-pol
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/2206.10877 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:2206.10877

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().