Most claimed statistical findings in cross-sectional return predictability are likely true

Andrew Y. Chen

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: The false discovery rate (FDR) measures the share of false positives in a set of statistical tests. I develop simple and intuitive bounds on the FDR in cross-sectional predictability publications. The simplest bound requires just a few lines of math and finds $\text{FDR} \le 25\%$ based on summary statistics in eight out of nine previous studies. A more refined bound finds $\text{FDR} \le 9\%$. The FDR is small because randomly selecting accounting ratios produces statistically significant predictability far more often than would occur if there were no predictability. The bounds also reconcile the disparate FDR estimates in the literature.

Date: 2022-06, Revised 2025-11
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ecm
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/2206.15365 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:2206.15365

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().