Measurement of Trustworthiness of the Online Reviews

Dipankar Das ()

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: In electronic commerce (e-commerce)markets, a decision-maker faces a sequential choice problem. Third-party intervention is essential in making purchase decisions in this choice process. For instance, while purchasing products/services online, a buyer's choice or behavior is often affected by the overall reviewers' ratings, feedback, etc. Moreover, the reviewer is also a decision-maker. The question that arises is how trustworthy these review reports and ratings are. The trustworthiness of these review reports and ratings is based on whether the reviewer is rational or irrational. Indexing the reviewer's rationality could be a way to quantify a reviewer's rationality, but it needs to communicate the history of their behavior. In this article, the researcher aims to derive a rationality pattern function formally and, thereby, the degree of rationality of the decision-maker or the reviewer in the sequential choice problem in the e-commerce markets. Applying such a rationality pattern function could make quantifying the rational behavior of an agent participating in the digital markets easier. This, in turn, is expected to minimize the information asymmetry within the decision-making process and identify the paid reviewers or manipulative reviews.

Date: 2022-10, Revised 2025-10
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-mkt and nep-pay
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/2210.00815 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:2210.00815

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().