Heterogeneous Position Effects and the Power of Rankings
Rafael P. Greminger
Papers from arXiv.org
Abstract:
Many online retailers and search intermediaries present products on ranked product lists. Because changing the ordering of products influences their revenues and consumer welfare, these platforms can design rankings to maximize either of these two metrics. In this paper, I study how rankings serving these two objectives differ and what determines this difference. First, I highlight that when position effects are heterogeneous, rankings can increase both revenues and consumer welfare by increasing the overall conversion rate. Second, I provide empirical evidence for this heterogeneity, highlighting that cheaper alternatives have stronger position effects. Finally, I quantify revenue and consumer welfare effects across the different rankings. To this end, I develop an estimation procedure for the search and discovery model of Greminger (2022) that yields a smooth likelihood function by construction. The results from the model show that rankings designed to maximize revenues can also increase consumer welfare. Moreover, these revenue-based rankings reduce consumer welfare only to a limited extent relative to a consumer-welfare-maximizing ranking.
Date: 2022-10, Revised 2023-12
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dcm and nep-pay
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/2210.16408 Latest version (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:2210.16408
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().