EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Algorithmic Collusion in Auctions: Evidence from Controlled Laboratory Experiments

Pranjal Rawat

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: Algorithms are increasingly being used to automate participation in online markets. Banchio and Skrzypacz (2022) demonstrate how exploration under identical valuation in first-price auctions may lead to spontaneous coupling into sub-competitive bidding. However, it is an open question if these findings extend to affiliated values, optimal exploration, and specifically which algorithmic details play a role in facilitating algorithmic collusion. This paper contributes to the literature by generating robust stylized facts to cover these gaps. I conduct a set of fully randomized experiments in a controlled laboratory setup and apply double machine learning to estimate granular conditional treatment effects of auction design on seller revenues. I find that first-price auctions lead to lower seller revenues and higher seller regret under identical values, affiliated values, and under both Q-learning and Bandits. There is more possibility of such tacit collusion under fewer bidders, Boltzmann exploration, asynchronous updating, and longer episodes; while high reserve prices can offset this. This evidence suggests that programmatic auctions, e.g. the Google Ad Exchange, which depend on first-price auctions, might be susceptible to coordinated bid suppression and significant revenue losses.

Date: 2023-06, Revised 2025-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ain, nep-big, nep-des, nep-exp and nep-reg
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/2306.09437 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:2306.09437

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2306.09437