Advancing Ad Auction Realism: Practical Insights & Modeling Implications

Ming Chen, Sareh Nabi and Marciano Siniscalchi

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: Contemporary real-world online ad auctions differ from canonical models [Edelman et al., 2007; Varian, 2009] in at least four ways: (1) values and click-through rates can depend upon users' search queries, but advertisers can only partially "tune" their bids to specific queries; (2) advertisers do not know the number, identity, and precise value distribution of competing bidders; (3) advertisers only receive partial, aggregated feedback, and (4) payment rules are only partially known to bidders. These features make it virtually impossible to fully characterize equilibrium bidding behavior. This paper shows that, nevertheless, one can still gain useful insight into modern ad auctions by modeling advertisers as agents governed by an adversarial bandit algorithm, independent of auction mechanism intricacies. To demonstrate our approach, we first simulate "soft-floor" auctions [Zeithammer, 2019], a complex, real-world pricing rule for which no complete equilibrium characterization is known. We find that (i) when values and click-through rates are query-dependent, soft floors can improve revenues relative to standard auction formats even if bidder types are drawn from the same distribution; and (ii) with distributional asymmetries that reflect relevant real-world scenario, we find that soft floors yield lower revenues than suitably chosen reserve prices, even restricting attention to a single query. We then demonstrate how to infer advertiser value distributions from observed bids for a variety of pricing rules, and illustrate our approach with aggregate data from an e-commerce website.

Date: 2023-07, Revised 2024-04
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-des and nep-gth
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/2307.11732 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:2307.11732

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().