The Disagreement Dividend
Papers from arXiv.org
We study how disagreement influences the productive performance of a team in a dynamic game with positive production externalities. Players can hold different views about the productivity of the available production technologies. These differences lead to different technology and effort choices -- "optimistic" views induce higher effort than "skeptical" views. Views are resilient, changed only if falsified by surprising evidence. We find that, with a single technology, when the team disagrees about its productivity optimists exert more effort early on than when the team is like-minded. With sufficiently strong externalities, a disagreeing team produces on average more than any like-minded team, on aggregate. When team members can choose production technologies, disagreement over which technology works best motivates everyone to exert more effort and seek early successes that make others adopt their preferred technology. This always increases average output if the technologies are similarly productive in reality.
Date: 2023-08, Revised 2023-09
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-gth and nep-mic
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/2308.06607 Latest version (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:2308.06607
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().