Correcting Sample Selection Bias in PISA Rankings

Onil Boussim

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: This paper addresses the critical issue of sample selection bias in cross-country comparisons based on international assessments such as the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Although PISA is widely used to benchmark educational performance across countries, it samples only students who remain enrolled in school at age 15. This introduces survival bias, particularly in countries with high dropout rates, potentially leading to distorted comparisons. To correct for this bias, I develop a simple adjustment of the classical Heckman selection model tailored to settings with fully truncated outcome data. My approach exploits the joint normality of latent errors and leverages information on the selection rate, allowing identification of the counterfactual mean outcome for the full population of 15-year-olds. Applying this method to PISA 2018 data, I show that adjusting for selection bias results in substantial changes in country rankings based on average performance. These results highlight the importance of accounting for non-random sample selection to ensure accurate and policy-relevant international comparisons of educational outcomes.

Date: 2023-09, Revised 2025-10
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/2309.10642 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:2309.10642

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().