Can I Trust the Explanations? Investigating Explainable Machine Learning Methods for Monotonic Models

Dangxing Chen

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: In recent years, explainable machine learning methods have been very successful. Despite their success, most explainable machine learning methods are applied to black-box models without any domain knowledge. By incorporating domain knowledge, science-informed machine learning models have demonstrated better generalization and interpretation. But do we obtain consistent scientific explanations if we apply explainable machine learning methods to science-informed machine learning models? This question is addressed in the context of monotonic models that exhibit three different types of monotonicity. To demonstrate monotonicity, we propose three axioms. Accordingly, this study shows that when only individual monotonicity is involved, the baseline Shapley value provides good explanations; however, when strong pairwise monotonicity is involved, the Integrated gradients method provides reasonable explanations on average.

Date: 2023-09
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-big, nep-cmp and nep-ecm
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/2309.13246 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:2309.13246

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().