Identification, Impacts, and Opportunities of Three Common Measurement Considerations when using Digital Trace Data

Daniel Muise, Nilam Ram, Thomas Robinson and Byron Reeves

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: Cataloguing specific URLs, posts, and applications with digital traces is the new best practice for measuring media use and content consumption. Despite the apparent accuracy that comes with greater granularity, however, digital traces may introduce additional ambiguity and new errors into the measurement of media use. In this note, we identify three new measurement challenges when using Digital Trace Data that were recently uncovered using a new measurement framework - Screenomics - that records media use at the granularity of individual screenshots obtained every few seconds as people interact with mobile devices. We label the considerations as follows: (1) entangling - the common measurement error introduced by proxying exposure to content by exposure to format; (2) flattening - aggregating unique segments of media interaction without incorporating temporal information, most commonly intraindividually and (3) bundling - summation of the durations of segments of media interaction, indiscriminate with respect to variations across media segments.

Date: 2023-09
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-pay
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/2310.00197 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:2310.00197

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().