Tradeoffs and Comparison Complexity

Cassidy Shubatt and Jeffrey Yang

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: Using theory and experiments, this paper shows that the difficulty of making tradeoffs offers a parsimonious explanation for a wide range of behavioral phenomena. We develop a model of imprecise comparisons applicable to multiattribute, lottery, and intertemporal choice, which formalizes the idea that comparisons are difficult when they involve pronounced tradeoffs. Our model rationalizes a range of documented regularities, such as context effects, preference reversals, apparent probability weighting and hyperbolic discounting, and generates novel implications for behavior. We assess the explanatory power of our model in a series of choice experiments. Our model explains a large share of the variation in choice inconsistency across problems, and we document that manipulating tradeoffs reverses classic behavioral regularities, in line with its predictions.

Date: 2024-01, Revised 2026-03
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe, nep-dcm and nep-evo
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/2401.17578 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:2401.17578

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().