Is Inference Conditional on Not Rejecting a Pre-test Less Reliable than Unconditional Inference?

Cl\'ement de Chaisemartin and Xavier D'Haultf{\oe}uille

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: Assume that an estimator is asymptotically normal for a target parameter under some conditions. Suppose also that one can test these conditions, and one conducts inference for the target only if the pre-test is not rejected. Does such pre-testing undermine inference? We show that if the tested conditions and mild regularity restrictions hold, conditional inference is still valid, albeit typically conservative. Validity holds regardless of the asymptotic dependence between the estimator and the pre-test. If the tested conditions do not hold, we exhibit conditions under which confidence intervals have larger conditional than unconditional coverage.

Date: 2024-07, Revised 2026-04
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/2407.03725 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:2407.03725

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().