Investment strategies based on forecasts are (almost) useless

Michael Weba

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: Several studies on portfolio construction reveal that sensible strategies essentially yield the same results as their nonsensical inverted counterparts; moreover, random portfolios managed by Malkiel's dart-throwing monkey would outperform the cap-weighted benchmark index. Forecasting the future development of stock returns is an important aspect of portfolio assessment. Similar to the ostensible arbitrariness of portfolio selection methods, it is shown that there is no substantial difference between the performances of ``best'' and ``trivial'' forecasts - even under euphemistic model assumptions on the underlying price dynamics. A certain significance of a predictor is found only in the following special case: the best linear unbiased forecast is used, the planning horizon is small, and a critical relation is not satisfied.

Date: 2024-08
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/2408.01772 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:2408.01772

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().