Policy consequences of the new neuroeconomic framework

A. David Redish, Henri Scott Chastain, Carlisle Ford Runge, Brian M. Sweis, Scott E. Allen and Antara Haldar

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: Current theories of decision making suggest that the neural circuits in mammalian brains (including humans) computationally combine representations of the past (memory), present (perception), and future (agentic goals) to take actions that achieve the needs of the agent. How information is represented within those neural circuits changes what computations are available to that system which changes how agents interact with their world to take those actions. We argue that the computational neuroscience of decision making provides a new microeconomic framework (neuroeconomics) that offers new opportunities to construct policies that interact with those decision-making systems to improve outcomes. After laying out the computational processes underlying decision making in mammalian brains, we present four applications of this logic with policy consequences: (1) precommitment to avoid falling into the trap of sunk costs, (2) media consequences for changes in housing prices after a disaster, (3) contingency management as a treatment for addiction, and (4) how social interactions underlie the success (and failure) of microfinance institutions.

Date: 2024-09, Revised 2024-12
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-eur, nep-hme and nep-ipr
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/2409.07373 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:2409.07373

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators (help@arxiv.org).