Unconditional Randomization Tests for Interference

Liang Zhong

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: Researchers are often interested in the existence and extent of interference between units when conducting causal inference or designing policy. However, testing for interference presents significant econometric challenges, particularly due to complex clustering patterns and dependencies that can invalidate standard methods. This paper introduces the pairwise imputation-based randomization test (PIRT), a general and robust framework for assessing the existence and extent of interference in experimental settings. PIRT employs unconditional randomization testing and pairwise comparisons, enabling straightforward implementation and ensuring finite-sample validity under minimal assumptions about network structure. The method's practical value is demonstrated through an application to a large-scale policing experiment in Bogota, Colombia (Blattman et al., 2021), which evaluates the effects of hotspot policing on crime at the street segment level. The analysis reveals that increased police patrolling in hotspots significantly displaces violent crime, but not property crime. Simulations calibrated to this context further underscore the power and robustness of PIRT.

Date: 2024-09, Revised 2025-07
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ecm, nep-net and nep-ure
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/2409.09243 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:2409.09243

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().