AI Persuasion, Bayesian Attribution, and Career Concerns of Doctors

Hanzhe Li, Jin Li, Ye Luo and Xiaowei Zhang

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: This paper examines how AI persuades doctors when their diagnoses differ. Disagreements arise from two sources: attention differences, which are objective and play a complementary role to the doctor, and comprehension differences, which are subjective and act as substitutes. AI's interpretability influences how doctors attribute these sources and their willingness to change their minds. Surprisingly, uninterpretable AI can be more persuasive by allowing doctors to partially attribute disagreements to attention differences. This effect is stronger when doctors have low abnormality detection skills. Additionally, uninterpretable AI can improve diagnostic accuracy when doctors have career concerns.

Date: 2024-10
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ain
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/2410.01114 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:2410.01114

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().