Randomly Assigned First Differences?

Facundo Arga\~naraz, Cl\'ement de Chaisemartin and Ziteng Lei

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: We consider treatment-effect estimation using a first-difference regression of an outcome evolution $\Delta Y$ on a treatment evolution $\Delta D$. Under a causal model in levels with a time-varying effect, the regression residual is a function of the period-one treatment $D_{1}$. Then, researchers should test if $\Delta D$ and $D_{1}$ are correlated: if they are, the regression may suffer from an omitted variable bias. To solve it, researchers may control nonparametrically for $E(\Delta D|D_{1})$. We use our results to revisit first-difference regressions estimated on the data of \cite{acemoglu2016import}, who study the effect of imports from China on US employment. $\Delta D$ and $D_{1}$ are strongly correlated, thus implying that first-difference regressions may be biased if the effect of Chinese imports changes over time. The coefficient on $\Delta D$ is no longer significant when controlling for $E(\Delta D|D_{1})$.

Date: 2024-11, Revised 2025-07
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ecm
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/2411.03208 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:2411.03208

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().