Good Controls Gone Bad: Difference-in-Differences with Covariates

Sunny Karim and Matthew Webb

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: This paper introduces the common causality of covariates (CCC) assumption in difference-in-differences with covariates. This assumption stipulates that covariates must have common effects on untreated potential outcomes across regions and periods. We also introduce Integrated Parallel Trends, a weaker alternative to conditional parallel trends that does not require point-wise equality of trends across covariate values, and can accommodate CCC violations. Pre-trend diagnostics for integrated parallel trends may reveal plausibly parallel trends that are obscured under conventional conditional parallel trends diagnostics, thereby broadening the set of empirical settings in which credible DID identification may be possible. Furthermore, we propose a new estimator called the Integrated Difference-in-Differences (DID-INT) estimator, which can identify the ATT when integrated parallel trends holds and the CCC assumption is violated. The DID-INT estimator can also accommodate treatment-effect heterogeneity with respect to covariates and compositional changes, while avoiding forbidden comparisons in staggered adoption settings.

Date: 2024-12, Revised 2026-10
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ecm
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.14447 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:2412.14447

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().