Evidence aggregation with ignorance in mind: learning what we do (not) know for archetypes discovery

Emily Breza, Arun G. Chandrasekhar and Davide Viviano

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: When evaluating policy interventions, researchers often pursue two related goals: identifying which individuals or contexts benefit most, and determining whether patterns of treatment effect heterogeneity can be used to aggregate evidence across environments. We develop a framework that aggregates treatment effect heterogeneity, defined over individual and environmental characteristics, into interpretable summaries while setting aside contexts in which extrapolation is unreliable and further evidence is needed. The procedure therefore learns both how to summarize heterogeneous effects and when researchers should admit ignorance. We derive finite-sample regret guarantees, provide data-driven guarantees for selecting the complexity of the summary class, and inference procedures that quantify the value of follow-up data collection. We illustrate the approach by reanalyzing a multifaceted anti-poverty program implemented in six countries.

Date: 2025-01, Revised 2026-06
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ecm
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2501.13355 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:2501.13355

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().