EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Generalizability with ignorance in mind: learning what we do (not) know for archetypes discovery

Emily Breza, Arun G. Chandrasekhar and Davide Viviano

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: When studying policy interventions, researchers often pursue two goals: i) identifying for whom the program has the largest effects (heterogeneity) and ii) determining whether those patterns of treatment effects have predictive power across environments (generalizability). We develop a framework to learn when and how to partition observations into groups of individual and environmental characterstics within which treatment effects are predictively stable, and when instead extrapolation is unwarranted and further evidence is needed. Our procedure determines in which contexts effects are generalizable and when, instead, researchers should admit ignorance and collect more data. We provide a decision-theoretic foundation, derive finite-sample regret guarantees, and establish asymptotic inference results. We illustrate the benefits of our approach by reanalyzing a multifaceted anti-poverty program across six countries.

Date: 2025-01, Revised 2025-07
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ecm
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/2501.13355 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:2501.13355

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().

 
Page updated 2025-09-20
Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2501.13355