Collective Intelligence in Dynamic Networks

Florian Mudekereza

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: We revisit DeGroot learning to examine the robustness of social learning in dynamic networks -- networks that evolve randomly over time. Dynamics have double-edged effects depending on social structure: while they can foster consensus and boost collective intelligence in "sparse" networks, they can have adverse effects such as slowing down the speed of learning and causing long-run disagreement in "well-connected" networks. Collective intelligence arises in dynamic networks when average influence and trust remain balanced as society grows. We also find that the initial social structure of a dynamic network plays a central role in shaping long-run beliefs. We then propose a robust measure of homophily based on the likelihood of the worst network fragmentation.

Date: 2025-02, Revised 2025-06
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-net and nep-soc
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/2502.12660 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:2502.12660

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().