EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Verifiable affirmative action in school admissions

Xinquan Hu and Jun Zhang

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: When implementing affirmative action through reserve systems, to maintain social trust and demonstrate the absence of corruption, countries such as Brazil, China, and India aim for verifiable allocations of reserve quotas, allowing students to confirm their assignments using private information and publicly disclosed data such as school admission cutoffs. Motivated by this, we study verifiable mechanisms in the controlled school choice model. We first show that sequential mechanisms, which allocate reserved and open seats in separate stages, offer intuitive verifiability but suffer from strategic complexity and inefficiency. We then formalize verifiability for simultaneous mechanisms, which allocate all seats in a single stage. We prove that a mechanism is individually rational, strategy-proof, and verifiable if and only if it is a deferred acceptance mechanism using one of two choice rules we characterize. We recommend a specific rule and mechanism and discuss their practical relevance to China's high school admissions.

Date: 2025-04, Revised 2025-08
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cna and nep-ure
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/2504.04689 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:2504.04689

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().

 
Page updated 2025-08-18
Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2504.04689