 Comrades and Cause: Peer Influence on West Point Cadets' Civil War AllegiancesYuchen Guo, Matthew Jackson and Ruixue Jia Abstract: Do social networks and peer influence shape major life decisions in highly polarized settings? We explore this question by examining how peers influenced the allegiances of West Point cadets during the American Civil War. Leveraging quasi-random variations in the proportion of cadets from Free States, we analyze how these differences affected cadets' decisions about which army to join. We have four main findings. First, there was a strong and significant peer effect: a higher proportion of classmates from Free States significantly increased the likelihood that cadets from Slave States joined the Union Army. Second, the peer effect interacted with geography and economic circumstances: almost all cadets from Free States joined the Union Army (if they decided to join the war), and most cadets from Slave States that had more than a third of their population in slavery joined the Confederacy. The cadets who were most highly influenced were from Slave States that had less than a third of their population in slavery. Third, we analyze how cadets' decisions affected their military rank and career outcomes. Fourth, we show that having served together in the Mexican-American war increased the peer influence, providing additional evidence that peer interaction was influential. Date: 2025-07, Revised 2025-09 Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:2507.09419 Access Statistics for this paper More papers in Papers from arXiv.org |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.