Refining the Notion of No Anticipation in Difference-in-Differences Studies

Marco Piccininni, Eric J. Tchetgen Tchetgen and Mats J. Stensrud

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: We address an ambiguity in identification strategies using difference-in-differences, which are widely applied in empirical research, particularly in economics. The assumption commonly referred to as the "no-anticipation assumption" states that treatment has no effect on outcomes before its implementation. However, because standard causal models rely on a temporal structure in which causes precede effects, such an assumption seems to be inherently satisfied. This raises the question of whether the assumption is repeatedly stated out of redundancy or because the formal statements fail to capture the intended subject-matter interpretation. We argue that confusion surrounding the no-anticipation assumption arises from ambiguity in the intervention considered and that current formulations of the assumption are ambiguous. Therefore, new definitions and identification results are proposed.

Date: 2025-07
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/2507.12891 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:2507.12891

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().